Reservation!

Yes, it is needed but it has to be evolving and changes had to be applied to revise the criteria. How long is one going to be backward or prefer to be backward just because he/she is getting benefits out of it? For example, if one in a family is provided a reservation, then it should be ensured that the family that he/she belongs to is pulled up by the benefit given to him/her. Regular follow-up is required to analyze the reservation benefits utilized. Just because a policy is made it doesn't mean it has to be followed forever. Always there is an upgrade. Some things may be applicable into the society after a time period. It has to be understood. When there was a discrimination based on castes, their living style, their day-to-day provisions, the reservation was a 'must have' revolution. Agree that without this revolution this difference would have been high and would have been a regular fight for them. As times are changing and the betterment is being seen and enjoyed now, revision to some extent is required. Without a revision or change or upgrade any good notion will be unappreciable.

This appears to be pushing every other people to the backward and then come up! Should we be in the group where we prefer to be backward so that we get the benefits out of it? Financial, Lifestyle status - should be made the preference. People are being pulled up and are being developed! These status updates have to be registered and considered for further reservations. Generations have to be taken into account and an account tally has to be arrived at! What if they use the reservation not upto its mark and just ignore its original value? Why not keep a restriction to the count of reservation applied to a family? Once a backward family is given a chance to be pulled out of the backward treatment, what if they still don't see or use it, to its real or valued outcome?

And is this how we achieve equality be it case or life structure? And we have to bring back equality only by killing the knowledge in the capables, just as a punishment to their ancestors?! We always have a soft corner for the underprivileged and weaker ones just like Mothers! Focusing on the weaker ones will be good so that we can bring all the stronger ones down to become weak as well!!! So things are easy for the weaker ones again!

As a mother aren't we supposed to encourage them to come up on their own with little support? But if we give all the support that they would ask for forever, are we not pushing them to handicap? As a mother is that what we would want to do?